The hardware

The iPad looks like an obese iPhone. That’s not a bad thing – the iPhone will still be in design textbooks 200 years from now – but the overall proportions do surprise me a little. First, the display doesn’t have a widescreen ratio, which has pretty much been the standard in recent years. Instead, it features a 9.7-inch 1024×768-pixel resolution at 132 pixels per inch 4:3 ratio display with IPS technology, which means that widescreen movies will have huge black bars on top and bottom.

Second, the bezel looks really fat compared to the dimensions of the device. Apple should have made it much thinner and added one or two inches of screen real estate. On the other hand, the bezel may be explained by the fact that you do need, after all, a place to hold the device without accidentally inputting commands on the touchscreen. Globally, the iPad’s design reminds me of a photo frame, an over inflated iPod Touch.

The insides are the real surprise. The device uses an Apple-designed chip it is calling the “A4,” (Apple finally got some use out of that PA Semi purchase, apparently) which runs at 1GHz and is used for managing everything: Processing, graphics, and I/O. The system has between 16 and 64GB of flash memory, contains Bluetooth and EDR wireless connectivity, has a speaker, and microphone, and also contains Apple’s accelerometers, ambient light sensors, and digital compass with assisted GPS technologies. There is a 30-pin connector for attaching the device to computers, but it also uses Bluetooth and Enhanced Data Rate technologies for fast wireless access up to 3Mbps. The device has a powerful battery that gives up to 10 hours of usage, and nearly a month of standby time. It’s a half-inch thick—just a hair thicker than the iPhone, for reference—and weighs 1.5 pounds. Video output runs through and iPhone-type composite adapter at up to 576p and through a dock-to-VGA adapter at up to 1024 x 768. No HDMI, no DVI—not even a Mini DisplayPort. Oh, and there isn’t a rear-facing camera, nor is there a front-facing camera. This tablet is totally camera-less, which seems a bit odd. According to Gizmodo editors, who already had the privilege of using the iPad, “it’s fasssstttt”.

The software

The operating system on the tablet is based on iPhone OS, which is in turn loosely based on OSX. In other words, it’s got the same guts as the iPhone, as well as a somewhat similar interface. What this means in practical terms is that the UI is modal; you can only display one app at a time, and there aren’t windows, per se. Apparently, the iPad currently runs on iPhone OS 3.2.

The homescreen is like a mixture between the iPhone and OSX: it uses the iPhone launcher/apps metaphor, but has an OSX-style shiny dock. It feels very spread out compared to the iPhone’s homescreen, though I suspect this is necessary to keep things from getting too overwhelming. Maybe they could have fixed this by making the icons bigger? The good news is that you can apparently customize the background.

The onscreen keyboard is very similar to the iPhone’s. Typing on it is apparently a “dream,” and “almost lifesize,” by which Steve Jobs means the size of a full hard keyboard. He wasn’t typing with his thumbs, but with his fingers, as if it were an actual laptop keyboard. Navigation throughout the rest of the OS is optimized for one hand, though. This wasn’t handled very well by Apple, they could have easily innovated with some kind of hybrid context sensitive input method, but they chose to go the safe, boring and quite unpractical way.

The browser is essentially an upscaled version of Safari Mobile, with a familiar, finger-friendly title bar and not much else. It rotates by command of the accelerometer. Apparently, it doesn’t support flash, which is an acceptable shortcoming on the iPhone, but not on a larger device like the iPad.

• Email: Mail again takes its visual cues from the iPhone, but with a lot more decoration: you can preview your mailbox from any message with a pull-down menu, and preview any message from within the mailbox, with a pop-up window.

• Music: The music player is even more hybirdized, styled like a mix between the iPhone’s iPod interface and full-fledged desktop iTunes. Interestingly, Cover Flow seems to have more or less died off. The iTunes redesign looks very fresh yet familiar, I’m quite curious to see if this will come to the desktop version of the app.

• Video: YouTube is available by way of an app, iPhone-style, which can play videos in HD. iTunes content plays back in a dedicated app, just like on the iPhone, and can also play back in HD.

• Calendar and contacts: The calendar app is desktop-like, until you open organizer mode, where it looks like a literal organizer. It’s beautiful, and dare I say a bit Courier-like. I would love to see this on the iPhone.

• Maps: This one may be the most direct conversion from the iPhone, with a very similar interface through and through. It includes Street View, too, which looks amazing on the large screen. Apparently, Apple isn’t ditching Google just yet.

• Photos: The photo library app looks a lot like iPhoto, only adapted for multitouch finger input. You can view your albums as stacks, spread them out, and sync with your desktop iPhoto to get access to faces and map functionality.

Apps

All 140,000 iPhone apps will run on the iPad. Because the screen is bigger, you’ll have to choose between running the app in the center of your screen, or in “pixel double” mode, which just blows them up crudely. Any apps you’ve purchased for your iPhone can be synced, for free, to your iPad.

The iPhone app SDK has already been expanded for tablet development, including a whole new set of UI elements and expanded resolution support. The raw iPhone app compatibility is just a temporary measure, it seems—any developer who wants their app to run on the tablet will develop for the tablet. Some of the early examples of adapted apps, like Brushes, are spectacular. More on the SDK here.

Today, Steve Jobs underlined two new apps, specifically designed for the iPad.

The first one, iBooks, is Kindle’s death. Users are basically able to buy books from an online store (same system as the App store or iTunes store),  and publishers include Penguin, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, Macmillan, and Hachette—the big boys. The demonstration was very convincing: the app features a gorgeous UI and 3D effects to simulate real books. Only time will tell if it can compete with e-paper.

The second app is iWork, specifically designed for the iPad’s multitouch capabilities. There’s a new version of Keynote designed just for the iPad, as well as new version of Pages, Apple’s excellent word processor, and Numbers, which is the spreadsheet app. The interfaces are obviously designed strictly for touch input, but from the looks of it can handle every function that the old, mouse-centric version could, plus a few more. And man, they’re so much prettier. Each app costs $10, and you can get them all for $30.

Price and Release Date

The iPad ships worldwide in 60 days, but only in Wi-Fi versions. The 3G version will be another 30 days after that. Here are the prices:

Without 3G:

• $499: 16GB

• $599: 32GB

• $699: 64GB

With 3G:

• $629: 16GB

• $729: 32GB

• $829: 64GB

Apple will ship all the iPads in 60 days—the end of March—to America, and just the Wi-Fi models internationally. It’ll be another 30 days beyond that for 3G models to be available outside our shores; Apple says they’re still working on carrier deals.

3G comes by way of AT&T, who’s offering the service without contract, for $15 a month (250MB of data) or $30 a month (unlimited). That’s why, unlike the iPhone, the iPad is actually cheaper off-contract.

Verdict

It’s hard to reach one, given the fact that I have never used an iPad, but I must admit I’m somewhat underwhelmed by today’s keynote. The tension, suspense, and expectations that originated from the iPad have led us to think the Apple’s new device would be revolutionary, but it isn’t, or at least not right now. The lack of camera may seem awkward to some, but I understand the choice: do you see yourself holding the iPad in front of you to take a shot? Kinda weird. A front facing camera for video conferences would have been nice, but I still prefer the iPad to have none and to cost only 499$. The major shortcoming, according to me, is the lack of multitasking. What’s the point of such a huge amount of processing power and screen estate if you can’t run two apps at once? Seriously Apple, this is a big letdown. Oh and did I mention you need an adapter for USB?

When the iPhone was first released, I was very skeptical. “What? It can’t even do copy and paste?” I used to ask. But as you know, the iPhone  has changed the industry thanks to its unique app store model and a few OS updates. I expect no less from the iPad.

Is it a Kindle killer? Deffinitely yes, as long as people’s eyes don’t start exploding after using the iPad. Is it a netbook killer? Maybe. Some people may need a physical keyboard, but overall, I’d go with iPad because of its incredible UI and thousands of available apps. Oh and let’s not oversee all the nice accessories, including a physical keyboard, which may help you resolve your dilemma.

The iPad seems to be suffering from what I call the Obama syndrome: expectations were so high that it is bound to fail at one point or another. Whatever Steve Jobs may have said or showed off today, people would have been disappointed  anyway. In addition to this, Apple cornered themselves and built a device that doesn’t really excel anywhere. Jack of some trades, master of none. They could have surprised us with a traditional “one more thing” at the end of the keynote: iWork / iLife 2010, iPhone OS 4.0, i7 chips in MacBook Pros, pretty doable stuff for Apple standards. But no. Steve decided to leave it there.
The iPad isn’t a bad device; in fact it’s a great device, and I want it right here, right now; but the non-Apple fanboy part of my brain is telling me to wait till iPad 2.0 or 3.0 comes out. Add flash support, multitasking, a way of organizing apps, a camera, two or three USB ports and you’ll have a winner.

Here is the official Apple video:

Contact the author via email

___

Via Gizmodo and Engadget

So what is this Apple tablet exactly? Good question. Actually, the right question would be is it? Apple has never acknowledged the existence of a tablet or any involvement in the development of such a device, and all we know about it comes from anonymous sources or obscure Asian electronics components manufacturers. Cens.com reports: “outbidding its Taiwanese counterpart Simplo Technology Co., Ltd., DynaPack International Technology Corp. has been exclusively contracted to supply up to 300,000 units of long lasting battery packs a month for Apple`s newest tablet PCs”. Reuters ads “Taiwan touchscreen specialist Wintek already makes small screens for Apple iPhones, and has received orders for the larger ones that are roughly the same size as those used in mini PCs, said the source close to the Taiwan firm”.
And we could go on and quote articles reporting about Apple orders regarding cameras, LED flashes, casings, processors and other parts of the tablet’s anatomy. Sources include the New York Times, Reuters, The Herald Tribune, The Financial Times and The Wallstreet Journal, in addition to the traditional Apple rumor generators like iLounge, Apple Insider, Gizmodo, CNET and Engadget.

But the most convincing indication of the Apple tablet’s existence is perhaps a letter written by bloodthirsty Apple lawyers to Gabriel Snyder, Editor-in-Chief at Valleywag of Gawker media, asking him to put an end to their “scavenger hunt“. A few days earlier, the very same website announced rewards up to 100,000$ for actual proof of the Tablet’s existence, and Apple was obviously not O.K. with that.

Anyway, we can state with quasi-certainty that the Apple tablet does exist, in one form or another. This leads us to the next question: what will it look like? Have a look at what the Apple fan community has come up with:

Seriously, if I were Steve Jobs, I would consider hiring a few of these brilliant designers. True, some concepts just don’t make sense (like the iPod controls on a touch screen) but the pictures clearly show that the world is expecting something incredibly sexy, slim, iPhone like. In fact, the tablet is expected to be nothing less that “an iPhone on steroids“, at least according the Gizmodo. At this point, the question of the operating system can be asked. This is one of Apple’s best guarded mysteries. According to Engadget, the Apple tablet will run on iPhone OS 4.0, and this would explain why no builds of the new OS have been made available to the developers yet: It simply contains too much tablet-related code.

Apple has developed the tablet in great secrecy, but there is one thing it just can’t hide: patents. Here is what Gizmodo has to say about that:
“This patent for a “display housing for a computing device” sure sounds like a tablet, which might fit into the tablet docking station in this patent, and you might use two hands, as shown in this patent, to interact with a multitouchable OS X, generously illustrated in this patent, unless you use a pen (ha ha ha). And it might be bumpy, in a cool way”. But don’t expect too much, Apple loves patenting stuff just for the heck (and money) of it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if at least some of these features appear on the tablet.

By the way features: what should we expect? Let’s imagine the best case scenario. The tablet would be about 10,7 inches wide, and have an OLED screen. The OS would be a OSX 10.6 special multitouch edition. The tablet would have a camera with flash, as well as a front facing webcam, wifi, a 3G (4G?) chip, an ARM processor and a GPS. The only probem with such a configuration would be the price: 1500$ at least. Take away the camera and flash, the OLED screen and OSX 10.6, as well as the 3G connectivity, and you might just be able to purchase for about 800$ or 900$, which would be the logical range, given the fact that it is precisely between the lower end Macbook and the iPhone’s price.

“Most of the excitement lately is that it’s going to redefine newspapers and magazines—we broke the news, using multiple sources, that Apple was talking with several media companies rooted in print about content for the tablet. Also, we heard there might be some kind of textbook content too. Plus, we’re not the only ones who’ve heard it’s got an ebook bent.
Also, well, it depends on the OS. iPhone OS 3.1 had clear traces of new Apple iProducts, and some people say it’s a bigass iPod touch, or at least running iPhone OS, which sorta fits with iPhone app developers supposedly being asked to make higher res versions of their apps for demonstration. It apparently fits in with the iTunes remodeling Apple’s got going on”, again according to Gizmodo.

But what about the name? We’ve seen everything: iSlate, iPad, iTablet, Apple Tablet, Macbook Touch, etc… The most probable name is the “iPad”, given the obvious connection with the iPod, and the fact that iPads, iPods and iPhones all start with the letters ‘iP’. Also, iPad.com seems to be unoccupied, and there’s the connection to Apple’s previous Newton MessagePad, the ancestral hardware relative of today’s iPhone, upon which to further ruminate. The only problem would be that it may remind people of IBM’s “Thinkpads”.

So what do I predict for January 27th? Let’s see.
It’s going to be a 10,7 inch tablet, ARM processor, runing iPhone OS 4.0, it will have wifi, and maybe an OLED screen. I’d be surprised to see 3G, or any kind of camera and flash. It’s going to be called the iPad, it’s going to cost 800$ and it will start shipping in the next few weeks.

Remember, that’s just speculation. There may not be a tablet. Nah, kidding, there will be a tablet, but Jobs only knows what it exactly is. We’ll write another article after the Apple event to compare what was expected and what Apple actually developed, and this will be way more interesting that the speculation itself. Stay tuned.

Contact the author via email

___

Via Gizmodo, Engadget, iLounge and Apple Insider

]]> http://techhaze.com/2010/01/imagine-the-apple-tablet/feed/ 6 http://techhaze.com/2009/12/headlines-looking-for-aliens-is-nuts-edition/ http://techhaze.com/2009/12/headlines-looking-for-aliens-is-nuts-edition/#comments Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:30:08 +0000 Florian Wardell http://techhaze.com/?p=604 Welcome to our first weekly headlines roundup. The aim of this series of articles is to give you a good insight not only on the tech world’s top news of the week, but to redirect you towards hand picked articles that are definitely worth reading. As always, if you’d like us to include a certain topic or if you know about an article that you feel worthy of this selection, send us an email at tips@techhaze.com and we’ll have a look. Also, don’t hesitate to leave comments bellow.

Alien research is crazy: Yup, Brad Niesluchowski got fired from his job at Higley Unified School District, because he looked for aliens using the SETI program of which he was the NEZ. Don’t ask, read.

Google’s Zeitgeist: Google published its 2009 Year-End Google Zeitgeist analysis. Surprise, Michael Jackson and Facebook are the fastest rising search terms on the net, while Beijing and Euro 2008 are freefalling. Have a look at the page

The second camera on smartphones is finally useful: Remember that small camera the the more expensive phone models? Yes, the one your girlfriend uses to do endless self-shoot sessions. Well guess what, it finally got useful, thanks to to VoIP video calls on mobile devices. Speciffically, there’s and iPhone app for that, “Fring”. Oh right, the iPhone doesn’t have any forward facing cam. Too bad.

Welcome to the bionic age: A guy managed to control a robotic hand using his mind. Anakin Skywalker, your bionic show off doesn’t impress anymore.

Quicksilver got updated: The popular (and genius) launch application for Mac OSX (only) got refreshed for Snow Leopard and also underwent performance tweaks and bug fixes. Not too bad for an app that’s not being developed anymore, and whose developer is working on Google Chrome.

Yes, an Apple Tablet post: We managed to go through two weeks of TechHaze writing without posting a single Apple Tablet article, but this time, we couldn’t resist: Have a look at Times Inc.’s approach to the matter.

Twitter founder wants your credit card info so bad that he invented an app (and accessory) for the iPhone. Oh, and he wants the money on the card as well, so be ready to spend 299$ for it.

It’s not the end of the world yet: I’ve always been worried the LHC would explode or something, creating a black hole that would swallow our aerospace writer, Raimondo, who lives in Swizzerland, because we need him. Anyway, our spacegeek readers can stay assured, the LHC is plagued by power failures (and world records).

Contact the author via email

___

Image courtesy: Yetska